Skip to main content

HA! Yeah like *that* is something *I'd* do! Snort!

I am reading a fairly implausible book right now. It's a romantic thriller. I like to read these sorts of things now and again; you know, stuff you might read on a vacation when you prefer your mind at about the consistency of bean dip.

Right now I like bean dip. A lot. In fact, yesterday I was reading this book while eating corn and black bean salsa with Tostitos restaurant style chips.

I know! Time to read!

And yet, here I am complaining that what I read was implausible. It is, no matter how often the characters say, "Oh shit!" and "What a clusterfuck." Although I myself say these things frequently about my own life and times, it's not at all the same thing. And when I try to imagine myself in the plot in the book---which, with my Guiness Book World Record Level Imagination I can usually do with great ease to the astonishment of my husband and to the concern of the mental health community worldwide---I think, "Pffffft, tsk, yeah, right, whatever, like that is something I'd do!"

Okay check this:

The heroine is the daughter of a SuperSpy. SuperSpy Dad sent her a mysterious and dangerous package. When she received it, she opened it and VOILA! mysterious and dangerous contents. She immediately thought, "Oh shit."

My comment: My dad is not a SuperSpy. However, he regularly sends me mysterious and dangerous things. I often think, "Oh shit!" upon opening them. Usually they are messages, typically about my failings. You know like, "Hey, Ju Ju, I know you are busy but you missed your stepmother's birthday for like the 25th year in a row. Could you drop her a little card, something?" Or, "We haven't seen you in a while...any chance you are taking a trip near us soon? We think your baby is about ready for college now, yes? And last we saw she was just pulling'd be nice to see you or hear from you..." You see? Oh shit. There, though, the similarity ends.

Shortly thereafter, her father arrived, hoping he got there before the package. When he discovered he didn't, he said, "Oh shit, what a clusterfuck." The heroine, his daughter, agreed. There followed a scene in which their entire history and relationship is played out in five minutes during which he manipulates her into handing over the package and saying, "Bye Dad, love you," as if that will end the matter, even though it is only page ten.

My comment: Who among us hasn't been emotionally guilted and manipulated by a parent, even as we realize consciously this is happening? However, MAJOR mysterious and dangerous packages that Very Scary People are after aren't usually the stakes. Also, and this is important, my parents do not ask me to break the law and traffic in stolen goods. If they did, I'd go commie on them and report them. I think. I'm pretty sure. It'd be their fault, you know, hammering into me this Sturdy Code of Ethics and Law-Abiding morality. So right away, the heroine and I have a major breach of trust.

The heroine then proceeds to call a variety of people over the next hour to inquire about the contents of the package. She's seeking information and in the process, putting large bugs in a large number of ears about the stolen goods. The purpose, apparently, is to display her honesty and naivete; the author repeatedly informs us that the heroine is a horrible liar, as do the people the heroine talks to, "You're a horrible liar, what's really going on?" they ask. The heroine herself is even honest enough to say she's a terrible liar, horrible at this SuperSpy game, always having eschewed it, due to her conflicted feelings about her dad and disgust for the effect of what he does.

My comment: We get it. She's lily white. Her only flaw is...being just too darn good. Again, here the heroine and I seriously part ways even more. I have many flaws, including being a really great dramatist, which some might call a flair for fiction or other crueler sorts might call lying. I have always aspired to be a SuperSpy in my fantasies, so I assure myself I'd be very, very good at the game. I say this, despite being told by a real SuperSpy once that I'd make a HORRID SuperSpy because I like to talk too much and enjoy telling stories way, way too much. I found this richly ironic considering this SuperSpy just told me (a) he was a SuperSpy, (b) it was a lot of fun to be a SuperSpy, and (c) where he had just gotten back from and what he had done there. At least I'd dramatize it straight out of any recognizability. How do I know he hadn't done the same? I don't. But he seemed like he was telling the truth. What? This proves his point? Me believing this? Oh you! Whatever!

Sigh sigh says our intrepid little heroine. She finishes her phone calls, tidies up her OCD level clean house---a nice little A-frame on the beach in California---and goes to bed.

Enter the hero.

A former SuperSpy, now a Private Contract SuperSpy, he breaks into our heroine's house, seeking the package. However, our up-to-that-point unscrupulous and hard-as-rocks hero immediately melts at the sight, smell and feel of the oh-so-innocent and seemingly-honest litle house. He completely believes the heroine must be completely innocent and there has been a terrible mistake.



He hears the cock of a pistol's safety being taken off. And turns to see the heroine, in thin, short silk nightshirt, standing with a 9mm pistol pointed right at him.

The two engage in witty repartee---otherwise known as Stalling Dialogue aka Setting the Scene for the Attraction---until...


Two assasins working for another SuperSpy, who is double-crossing SuperSpy Dad, burst in to kill both the hero and heroine.

The hero takes two bullets---in the Kevlar he had luckily been wearing---meant for the heroine, and their lasting happiness is immediately ensured. I mean, ensured as soon as they finish killing off or otherwise making impotent the other SuperSpies and Assasins, recover and return the mysterious and dangerous package, get over the "We're sorta kinda on opposite teams and can't trust one another plus we each represent what the other hates/fears," little humps.

There's some running, hiding, flying in private jets, wearing the same clothes for at least 200 pages, shooting at, dangerous hikes through deserts, exciting break-ins, and lots of subplots and other characters all twisting and attempting to make others twist in the wind, a completely creepy pair of Antagonists, one of whom is a la Grace Jones in a View to a Kill, complete with frequently prominent nipples that rise to attention on command, making all men in her path putty---or bean other words, more than a few hundred pages that would make Albert Zuckerman proud.

My comment: Except...unlike other's pretty implausible...

I know, I know. Pretty much all thrillers are completely implausible to the average joes. Yet, somehow, usually, I can willingly suspend my disbelief. For example, I was absolutely on a treasure hunt through Rome with Dan Brown in Da Vinci Code. Suzanne Brockmann keeps me on the edge of my seat.

The difference is I respect the thriller-level complexity of the characters and how they'll back down from their stereotypes when it makes sense to do so. Like, before they nearly get everyone killed. They display a sort of wisdom.

This lady...

If I heard someone break-in to my house, I'd be on the horn to 911 faster than you could say 911. In fact, I keep a phone right beside me for just this purpose. I don't have a gun in the house. If I had to defend myself, I keep an old can of Aquanet and I'd aim for the eyes, while shrieking to high heaven, and kneeing for any balls I could find. If proximity became an issue (as in, the intruder got closer rather than running for the hills crying repentance) I'd use my peace-symbol fingers to gouge eyes and elbow to crush a windpipe. But generally, I'd do my best to escape notice and wait for the big, tough police to come rescue me. Like they are paid to.

In fact...I've had this happen. And allow me to assure you, I did not dialogue with the gentleman in question who broke into my home. Nor did I cuddle with him, and allow him to kiss my temple reassuringly, his little Grinchy heart full of pity---all for ME!---for the first time in his amoral life. Unfortunately I inadvertantly revealed my presence, or otherwise I would have hid. He attempted to dialogue with me. He tried to excuse his presence in my home (As IF!). He even said, and this was wicked creepy, "What a large bed you have."

This clicked on my Holy Shit Act. I began shrieking in an attempt to wound him via his eardrums. I screamed, "I called 911, they'll be here any minute, LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE." I waved the clothes hanger I clutched at him menacingly and attempted to appear as deranged as possible.

I must have accomplished my purpose because he did, in fact, leave. I know. Wow. Sometimes that self-defense lesson stuff works!

If I think back, I guess one could say he was attractive enough, with a smooth voice---that part I recall clearly. However, I felt not one iota of anything other than terror. I did notice his build, you know, for the police sketch artist, and what he was wearing, for the same reason. I certainly did not notice it in any way admiringly. I looked for any details to share with the police who I hoped would find him, lock him up and throw away the key, and remembered to not let him move me from my position.

I certainly, unlike the heroine in the story, would not have handed him my gun (or clothes hanger in my case), spent some time chatting and GASP! flirting, and then left with him. Good grief...everything you are not supposed to do!

I tried really hard to give this poor chick a break. After all, she was raised by a mainly absentee SuerSpy father and broken-hearted mother who pined for her absentee SuperSpy Spouse. She got sucked into this whole Whirlpool (the book's title, by the way). And, after all, she's supposed to be so sweet, and she's so hurt by the men around her.

And there you major point of departure.

BAH! No victimhood! Kick 'em where it counts, girlfriend! Pick yourself up, dust yourself off, and quit living for and in total reaction to the men around you! Don't let them tell you that you can't play the SuperSpy game well! Be smart, figure it out!

I think of Kay Scarpetta, Robyn Hudson (poison ivy on the windowsill has to be the best security system ever), Sam Jones, Eve Dallas*...they wouldn't take this crap!

Or even...Jane Doe, as lame as that TV show is. Hey who doesn't like a housewife by day and secret SuperSpy who saves everyone's ass by night (although, actually, it's not as cut and dry as day versus night. She's more housewife before and after school and SuperSpy until soccer practice time. See? Anyone can squeeze in SuperSpy, even busy moms! Who bake! And run minivan carpools! There is hope for our lot yet! And this isn't a new concept. Anyone remember Scarecrow and Mrs. King? Anyone?

So yeah, the book, too implausible to really enjoy but eh...a moment to read. What's to complain about! And hey, it's just fiction, at least it's not some dangrous and mysterious message that makes me say, "Oh shit! What a clusterfuck!"

*The good reads I alluded to: Sparkle Hayter's Robyn, Lauren Henderson's Sam, JD Robb's Eve, and Patricia Cornwell's Kay.

So really...what makes or breaks your suspension of disbelief? Any good novel recs? And anyone know the name and title of that new mystery that got great reviews but I can't recall..something with a crazy long title, maybe math, physics or some complicated science in the title?

ETA: Some amazing oversights on my part! Okay a few more mystery/thriller writers I really enjoy and this sort of transcends the bean dip level but here goes: Dana Stabenow, Anne Perry, Kathy Reich, and Walter Mosely (the Easy Rawlins series). I also have to add in Janet Evanovich's Stephanie Plum series, and Elmore Leonard.

By Julie Pippert

© 2006. All images and text exclusive property of Julie Pippert. Not to be used or reproduced.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,, , ,


Kate said…
Har! I'm afraid one of Dan Brown's books hit the jackpot in terms of disbelief for me, because I work in the biz; I'm assuming that anyone who actually works in art history or curatorial stuff probably felt the same way about the DaVinci Code.

Of course I remember Scarecrow and Mrs. King. I loved it. It had Kate Jackson--a female actor who played parts with smarts!--and Bruce Boxleitner, who I had already fallen for, big time, from How The West Was Won, and continued my crush on in Babylon 5.

Great review. I won't buy the book. ;-)
Terri B. said…
Had fun reading your synopsis but will most likely skip this one. You see, I actually had a SpyDad and would just spend way too much time rolling my eyes at this plot!

My fave "bean dip" reading usually falls in the category of smart ass fiction such as Janet Evanovich's Stephanie Plum or Robert Crais' Elvis Cole.
Julie Pippert said…
Terri, Good grief, how could I have left out Stephanie Plum? And just when that series got good again!

I've even met Janet and have photos with her and my oldest DD.

You would roll your eyes at this book. Even I do. I mean, you can't write someone is smart and then have them act stupid, just like you can't write someone is trusting and have them spend the whole time acting paranoid and damaged LOL.

I'm also a huge Elmore Leonard fan and historical ones such as the late great Kate Ross, and Sharon Kay Penman. Oh my mind is blanking at one of the most literate. UGH Back later with that I hope.

Kate...for me the suspension of disbelief is when a book in engaging enough that I forget to evaluate it as "real versus not real" and the kicker "oh come on...I'd NEVER do THAT." I've been suckered by things that cover my profession at times...just because they were that entertaining.

I heart Kate Jackson! Parts with smarts---oh yes!

And Bruce. Sigh. Hunka hunka.

Thanks for your comments guys.

More book talk! Whee! My favorite sort. :)
Terri B. said…
OOOOOOO! Elmore Leonard! love love love love
Her Bad Mother said…
I got distracted at bean dip. Mmm, bean dip.
Bea said…
Was that break-in story a lie? Because if so, it was a really, really good one.

(I just posted today about how I'm a terrible liar, as you are already aware. Now I'm embarrassed.)
Julie Pippert said…
The break-in story is true. Here's the whole thing:

My DH and I had just moved into a very old house.

We were still unloading and unpacking. He ran out on an errand. A few minutes later I heard him open the door and come back in. or so I thought.

I called down, "Hon, what did you forget?"

And a strange man's voice answered, "I'm not your hon," and laughed.

I got cold chills and that rock stomach feeling.

We had the exchange I already described.

It turns out that it was the former tenant. He kept a key. He claims he thought he left something in the house. He waited outside until he saw my husband drive off, assuming it was both of us, or so he said. He then let himself in to snoop about, er, look for whatever it was he thought he left behind (the WHAT was never specified).

And he didn't get why we all found this VERY creepy!

I maintain he was up to no good. My radar said OFF OFF OFF CREEPY CREEPY and I believe it.

It's simply not what a normal person would do. And then to simply laugh and continue to act very creepy after he found I was there, instead of being horribly ashamed and leaving...well...

Actions speak loudly in this case I think.

And no worries...nothing wrong with being an honest person. I was mocking the book, which was dreadful and the lame character building device of hammering the poor reader with a minor trait, and mocking the one dimensional characterization---not mocking honesty. Honesty is good. Usually. :)

Popular posts from this blog

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Quorum

After being confronted with written evidence, Julie admits that she is a total attention whore. In some things, in some ways, sometimes I look outward for validation of my worth and existence. I admit it. It's my weak spot, my vanity spot . If you say I am clever, comment on a post, offer me an award, mention me on your blog, reply to a comment I left on your blog, or in any way flatter me as a writer...I am hopelessly, slavishly devoted to you. I will probably even add you to my blogroll just so everyone can see the list of all the cool kids who actually like me . The girl, she knows she is vain in this regard , but after much vanity discussion and navel-gazing , she has decided to love herself anyway, as she is (ironically) and will keep searching for (1) internal validation and (2) her first person . Until I reach a better point of self-actualization, though, may I just say that this week you people have been better than prozac and chocolate (together, with a side of whi

In defense of vanity...I think

Do you have one of those issues where you argue with yourself? Where you just aren't sure what you actually think because there are so many messages and opinions on the topic around you? I have more than one like this. However, there is one topic that has been struggling to the top of my mind recently: vanity and perceived vanity. Can vanity be a good thing? Vanity has historically been truly reviled. Vanity is number seven of the Seven Deadly Sins. It's the doppleganger of number seven on the Seven Holy Virtues list: humility. There are many moralistic tales of how vanity makes you evil and brings about a spectacular downfall. Consider the lady who bathed in the blood of virgins to maintain her youth. Google Borgia+vanity and find plenty. The Brothers Grimm and Disney got in on the act too. The Disney message seems to be: the truly beautiful don't need to be vain. They are just naturally eye-catchingly gorgeous. And they are all gorgeous. Show me the Reubenesque Pr

Is your name yours? How your name affects your success...

Made by Andrea Micheloni Not too long ago I read What's in a name? by Veronica Mitchell. She'd read the NPR/USA Today article, Blame it on your name , that shared new research results: "a preference for our own names and initials — the 'name-letter effect' — can have some negative consequences." Veronica's post and that article got me thinking about names, and their importance. Changing to my husband’s name and shedding my maiden name was no love lost for me. By the time we married, I’d have gladly married any other name just for a change. My maiden name was a trial; I was sick of spelling it, pronouncing it, explaining it, and dealing with the thoughtless rude comments about it. My sister and I dreamed and planned for the day we could shed that name. So I wonder, sometimes, whether I adequately considered what a name change would actually mean. Heritage and genealogy matter to me and my maiden name reflected a great deal of familial history. Histo